Sinn 155 S Revolution IIvsWolbrook Skindiver II Professional
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
17 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Sinn 155 S Revolution II vs Wolbrook Skindiver II Professional gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Sinn 155 S Revolution II is widely praised for its TEGIMENT-hardened, black PVD-coated stainless steel case and sapphire crystal, contributing to its durable tool watch identity. Reviewers note its legible bicompax dial with aged-look Super-LumiNova and a ghost-effect bezel, powered by a Sellita SW510 automatic chronograph movement. Owners report a slight misalignment in the 30-minute counter hand, which Sinn considers within tolerance. The watch's 43mm diameter and 51mm lug-to-lug measurement are considered large by some. Price points vary across sources, with one stating $3600 and another $2500 for this limited edition. On balance, owners and reviewers appreciate the Sinn 155 S Revolution II's robust build and vintage-inspired design, despite its substantial size and a minor hand alignment concern.
Owners widely praise the Wolbrook Skindiver II Professional for its comfortable wearability, long-lasting lume, and attractive dial designs, with some appreciating the quartz accuracy and smooth sweeping second hand. The watch features a 40mm diameter, a well-weighted 120-click unidirectional countdown bezel with a BGW9 lumed triangle, and a shock-resistant HexapleX case architecture. It is powered by either a Miyota 9015 or 8315 movement, with the latter adjusted in France to ±15 seconds per day and offering a 60-hour power reserve. Some owners find the 20mm strap potentially problematic and note it wears like a 42mm watch despite its 40mm case size. One reviewer expressed disappointment in hand color matching, poor lume, bezel wobble, and the watch sitting high on its strap, ultimately not recommending it.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











