Side by side

Ikepod Megapod M002vsOrient Multi-Year Calendar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Megapod M002
IkepodMegapod M002
MSRP $1,458
Multi-Year Calendar
OrientMulti-Year Calendar
MSRP $325

At a glance

14 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Megapod M00246mm
Multi-Year Calendar43.5mm
Power Reserve
Megapod M00240h
Multi-Year Calendar40h
Water Resistance
Megapod M00250m
Multi-Year Calendar50m
MSRP
Megapod M002$1,458
Multi-Year Calendar$325

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
Dress
Diameter
46mm
43.5mm
Thickness
17mm
11.5mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
50.2mm
Lug Width
20mm
22mm
Caseback
Solid
Display

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
Crystal
Sapphire
Mineral
AR Coating
Yes
Inner
Dial Color
Black
Champagne

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Miyota 9039
F6D22
Beat Rate
28,800 vph
21,600 vph
Jewels
25
22
Complications
None
Date

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,458
$325

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Ikepod Megapod M002 vs Orient Multi-Year Calendar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Ikepod Megapod M002

The Ikepod Megapod M002 is praised for its unique design and comfortable wearability, with owners noting it wears smaller than its 46mm case size due to its lugless, pebble-like shape. Legibility is good, aided by generous Super-LumiNova, and it is powered by a Miyota 9039 automatic movement. Some find the considerable size limits wearability for wrists under 44mm. Overall, owners and reviewers appreciate the Ikepod Megapod M002 for its distinctive design and surprisingly comfortable wearability despite its substantial dimensions.

Orient Multi-Year Calendar

Owners report the Orient Multi-Year Calendar features a complex analog display for tracking days and dates across multiple years, housed in a 45mm stainless steel case with 100m water resistance. Some owners view the watch as a visually appealing novelty, noting that manual adjustment is required for months and that the older 20-year calendar version is difficult to find. One owner observed only light signs of wear on their watch, with minor desk rash on the buckle visible only under magnification. On balance, owners appreciate the unique calendar complication as a visually appealing novelty.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.