Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 CopyvsChristopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 Copy is noted for its distinctive dial, featuring KAWS' signature "Chomper" teeth as hour markers and "X"s for hands, all housed within Ikepod's pebble-shaped 44mm titanium case. It is powered by a Swiss ETA 2892 movement and is water-resistant to 50 meters. On balance, the Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 Copy is seen as a niche collaboration appealing primarily to KAWS fans and collectors due to its unique artistic design.
Owners widely praise the Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 for its stunning aventurine dial and prominent, lumed moon, with one owner calling it a 10/10 for moon display. However, the lack of dial indices and lumed hands makes time-telling difficult, and the seconds hand is considered largely meaningless for precise tracking. Accuracy averages +2.3 seconds per day with a 38-hour power reserve. On balance, owners view the Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 as a showpiece dress watch for occasional wear, rather than a tool for precise timekeeping, due to its striking dial and moon complication.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsMore watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Follow this matchup
Get a note when Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 Copy vs Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.













