Side by side

Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 CopyvsDan Henry 1972

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Kaws HHTK03 Copy
IkepodKaws HHTK03 Copy
MSRP $50,220
1972
Dan Henry1972
MSRP $370

At a glance

7 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Kaws HHTK03 Copy40mm
197241mm
Power Reserve
Kaws HHTK03 Copy40h
197240h
Water Resistance
Kaws HHTK03 Copy100m
1972
MSRP
Kaws HHTK03 Copy$50,220
1972$370

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Diameter
40mm
41mm
Thickness
12mm
12.7mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
45.7mm
Material
Stainless Steel
316L Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
100m

Movement

1 specs
Caliber
ETA 2892

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$50,220
$370

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 Copy vs Dan Henry 1972 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 Copy

The Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 Copy is noted for its distinctive dial, featuring KAWS' signature "Chomper" teeth as hour markers and "X"s for hands, all housed within Ikepod's pebble-shaped 44mm titanium case. It is powered by a Swiss ETA 2892 movement and is water-resistant to 50 meters. On balance, the Ikepod Kaws HHTK03 Copy is seen as a niche collaboration appealing primarily to KAWS fans and collectors due to its unique artistic design.

Dan Henry 1972

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1972 Maverick for its cool retro style, 12-hour chronograph, sapphire crystal, and comfortable 40mm-equivalent wearability. The distinct chrono pusher clicks and the unique ability to turn off the running seconds are also noted strengths. However, the lume is not bright or evenly applied, and the alarm feature is considered poorly executed, with a quiet, short-lived alarm and a difficult-to-use pusher. One owner reported a negative customer service experience involving a dead quartz movement. Overall, owners rate the Dan Henry 1972 highly for its retro styling and value despite noted shortcomings in its lume and alarm functionality.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.