Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm AutomaticvsStudio Underd0g Full Moon
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
11 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic vs Studio Underd0g Full Moon gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic is noted for its non-tritium dial option, though some owners prefer the 1-12 numeral layout found on other models. One owner found the 36mm size too small for their wrist. Overall, owners appreciate the Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic for its non-tritium dial option.
Owners widely praise the Studio Underd0g Full Moon's harmonious creamy dial and its 37mm case, which fits flawlessly. The innovative sapphire disc with numerals is a highlight, though two visible screws holding it are noted as a minor aesthetic drawback. Some owners find the watch overpriced, while others see value in the upgraded Sellita movement under $1k. Lume is surprisingly good, and the included NATO strap is preferred by some over the leather. Accuracy ranges from +1/+2 seconds per day to about -6 seconds per day. On balance, owners rate the Studio Underd0g Full Moon highly for its versatile dial and well-fitting case at the price point.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.