Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm AutomaticvsTissot Supersport Chrono
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
13 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic vs Tissot Supersport Chrono gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic is noted for its non-tritium dial option, though some owners prefer the 1-12 numeral layout found on other models. One owner found the 36mm size too small for their wrist. Overall, owners appreciate the Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic for its non-tritium dial option.
Owners widely praise the Tissot Supersport Chrono for its visually appealing dial, handset, and case shape, with many finding it a great value for its price and noting excellent lume. Some owners report subdial hand misalignment, which Tissot considers within tolerance for certain units, and one owner sold theirs due to chronograph second hand movement when stationary. The watch's 44-45.5mm size is a point of contention, with some finding it too large for smaller wrists, while others report it fits well even on smaller wrists. On balance, owners rate the Tissot Supersport Chrono highly for its aesthetic appeal and value, despite some concerns regarding its size and chronograph function.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.