Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm AutomaticvsLongines CONQUEST
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
19 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
9 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
6 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic vs Longines CONQUEST gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic is noted for its non-tritium dial option, though some owners prefer the 1-12 numeral layout found on other models. One owner found the 36mm size too small for their wrist. Overall, owners appreciate the Marathon Arctic OSAR 36mm Automatic for its non-tritium dial option.
Owners widely praise the Longines CONQUEST for its excellent price-performance ratio, high-quality finishing, and versatile design, with many highlighting its comfortable wearability due to curved lugs. The smooth winding action and attractive dial colors are also frequently cited positives. However, reviewers and owners consistently note the bracelet's lack of on-the-go micro-adjustment, which can impact fit, and several find the lume to be weak. One owner reported the crown and guards rubbing against the wrist when typing. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Longines CONQUEST highly for its impressive finishing and value, despite minor bracelet and lume drawbacks.
The watch's wearable case size and dial work are highlighted as strengths. The bracelet's end-link fit is cited as a weakness.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











