Side by side

Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — HaovsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Porcelain Odyssey — Hao
Atelier WenPorcelain Odyssey — Hao
MSRP $5,450
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Porcelain Odyssey — Hao39mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Porcelain Odyssey — Hao40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Porcelain Odyssey — Hao50m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Porcelain Odyssey — Hao$5,450
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Diameter
39mm
38mm
Thickness
11.7mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
42mm
Lug Width
19mm
20mm
Material
316L Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
Crystal
Domed Sapphire
Sapphire
Dial Color
Regular
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$5,450
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — Hao vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — Hao

Owners and reviewers widely praise the Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — Hao for its striking porcelain dial and heat-treated blued hands, which incorporate Chinese patterns and history. The Peacock SL3006 automatic movement provides a two-day power reserve, though some owners report a rough and stiff winding feel when manually operating the crown. On balance, the Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — Hao is highly regarded by owners and reviewers for its unique dial and hand finishing at its price point.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.