Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — HaovsGruppo Gamma Field III GMT
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
15 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — Hao vs Gruppo Gamma Field III GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — Hao for its striking porcelain dial and heat-treated blued hands, which incorporate Chinese patterns and history. The Peacock SL3006 automatic movement provides a two-day power reserve, though some owners report a rough and stiff winding feel when manually operating the crown. On balance, the Atelier Wen Porcelain Odyssey — Hao is highly regarded by owners and reviewers for its unique dial and hand finishing at its price point.
Owners praise the Gruppo Gamma Field III GMT for its look and value, with specific mentions of its sandwich dial and comfortable OEM straps. One owner notes incredible quality for the price across their Gruppo Gamma watches. The watch features a 40mm brushed stainless steel case, box sapphire crystal, and a Seiko NH34A movement with a 41-hour power reserve and stated accuracy of -20~+40 s/day. Some find the lack of a date window a drawback for a GMT, and question its differentiation from other NH34-powered watches. On balance, owners and reviewers find the Gruppo Gamma Field III GMT to be a good value with quality construction for its price point.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.