Horage Autark Tourbillon GMTvsBell & Ross BR-X3 Blue Steel
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
18 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Horage Autark Tourbillon GMT vs Bell & Ross BR-X3 Blue Steel gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Horage Autark Tourbillon GMT for its Swiss-made tourbillon, platinum micro-rotor, and super-thin 9mm titanium case design, noting little less than premium feel in case and movement finishing. The dial features a sub-seconds, date, and power reserve indicator, powered by an in-house movement with a 60-hour reserve. Some find the sub-dial illegible and hour hands difficult to read quickly, while others note the stepped bezel is not to their taste and the micro-rotor can be loud. The bracelet's lack of taper is also flagged as a drawback. On balance, owners rate the Horage Autark Tourbillon GMT highly for its premium finishing and innovative technical features at its price point.
The Bell & Ross BR-X3 Blue Steel is noted for its integration of the Kenissi movement into the BR-03 case, featuring a layered dial with a reoriented power reserve indicator. Owners find the lume bright, though less so in person than in images, and appreciate the comfort and unique dial variations, viewing it as an experimental piece. Reviewers note the three-date window is less clear than a single date display and find the blue dial's shininess excessive.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.