Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic ChronovsLongines LONGINES SPIRIT FLYBACK PROTOTYPE
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic Chrono vs LONGINES SPIRIT FLYBACK PROTOTYPE gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic Chrono is praised for its excellent case finishing, high-quality dial with applied indices, and generous BGW9 lume, with reviewers and owners noting its well-proportioned 39mm dimensions and balanced dial. The black rubber strap is considered surprisingly nice, and the watch offers a competitive package at $1,970. However, the chronograph pushers are not screw-down despite their appearance, and the 100m water resistance should not be used with the chronograph engaged. The 51.5mm lug-to-lug distance is noted as potentially problematic for smaller wrists, and the engagement of the Sellita SW200 movement is described as unremarkable, with the Oyster-style bracelet considered only of reasonable quality. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Echo/Neutra Averau Ceramic Chrono highly for its sharp design and quality finishing at its price point.
Owners widely praise the Longines Spirit Flyback Prototype for its attractive finishing, COSC-certified movement, and value as a flyback chronograph. Reviewers highlight its refined 39.5mm case and simplified dial, while some owners appreciate the reduced thickness and improved wearability compared to larger variants, with a lug-to-lug distance noted as potentially long for smaller wrists. The watch features a 68-hour power reserve and a bespoke L791.4 movement. However, the case thickness is a consistent point of discussion, with multiple sources citing 17mm, though some reviewers suggest thoughtful design makes it wear closer to 13.5-14mm. Owners are split on the dial's aesthetic, with some preferring previous configurations with gold subdial rings and concentric textures over the current flat matte dial and cut-off numbers. The leather strap is also noted as stiff and pinching.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









