Bremont S500vsTissot Seastar 1000 Quartz Chronograph
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
5 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Bremont S500 vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Quartz Chronograph gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Bremont S500's excellent Super-LumiNova lume and refined finishing, with many finding its 43mm case comfortable and versatile on the wrist due to short lugs and an offset crown. Reviewers and owners alike note its handsome, rugged design and improved dial legibility for diving. However, some find the 16mm to 16.5mm thickness less practical for daily wear, and one reviewer flags legibility issues with the dark dial and hands. Concerns are raised by one source regarding the three-piece case construction's long-term water resistance for actual diving, while another criticizes the understated bezel markings and the second hand's visibility in low light. The COSC-certified ETA 2836-2 movement provides a 38-hour power reserve. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Bremont S500 highly for its distinctive design and robust build quality, despite some reservations about its thickness and specific legibility elements.
The Tissot Seastar 1000 Quartz Chronograph is widely praised for its excellent value, solid build, and 300m water resistance, making it a capable summer watch. Owners appreciate its comfortable size, with one noting the 40mm variant as a "just right" fit, and others highlighting the attractive mineral bezels and throwback aesthetics of certain colorways. The watch features adequate lume on the dial and hands, with a green lume pip on the bezel, and a screw-down crown with decent grip. However, some criticisms have been raised. Reviewers and owners note a non-reflective crystal that can cause glare, mediocre lume in general, and excessive polishing on the case. The bracelet and clasp are frequently described as rattly and flimsy, with one owner finding the 19mm lug width too thin. There are also comments about a busy dial, ill-proportioned hands and indices, and a bezel that can be hard to read in certain light.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










