Bremont Supermarine 500MvsTissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
14 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Bremont Supermarine 500M vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Bremont Supermarine 500M's luxurious appearance and sapphire bezel, with some preferring its design over other luxury dive watches. Reviewers note its updated, legible dial with excellent, long-lasting Super-LumiNova lume. The hardened steel case with anti-reflective coating offers scratch resistance, and the crown placement is a favored feature. Some owners find the 43mm thickness substantial, and one reviewer questions the long-term water resistance of its three-piece case construction compared to traditional designs. Criticisms include the lack of a dive suit extension on the bracelet and a second hand that can be difficult to see in low light, with some finding the bezel markings could be more prominent. Overall, owners and reviewers consider the Bremont Supermarine 500M a handsome, rugged dive watch with a refined look that competes well with more expensive brands.
Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT for its excellent build quality, smooth winding feel, and the reliable Powermatic 80 movement providing an 80-hour power reserve. Reviewers highlight its remarkable value under $700, comfortable wearability, and appealing case/dial ratio. Some owners note the bezel's functionality for tracking a second time zone and the need to adjust the hour hand for date setting, a characteristic of its "True" GMT function. The rubber strap is considered comparable to those found on significantly more expensive watches. However, concerns exist regarding the movement's serviceability due to potential plastic components and reliance on Swatch Group service centers. Some find the bezel font and dial spacing unappealing, while others question the mineral glass bezel insert as a cost-cutting measure compared to ceramic. Accuracy is generally reported as good, though not COSC certified, and lume intensity is described as average by one owner.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











