Bremont Terra Nova 42.5 ChronographvsGlycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
18 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Bremont Terra Nova 42.5 Chronograph vs Glycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Bremont Terra Nova 42.5 Chronograph is noted for its 42.5mm Cupro-Aluminium case, which is described as blocky with satin finishing and minimal polishing, and a bi-directional bronze compass bezel with a black ceramic insert. Owners and reviewers highlight the satisfying winding action of the crown and crisp chronograph pushers, though one reviewer found the start/stop pusher required significant force. The watch features a green gradient dial with full-block Super-LumiNova numerals and is powered by a chronometer-rated automatic movement with a 56-hour power reserve and 100-meter water resistance. The CuAl7Si2 bronze alloy case is expected to patina over time, offering a warmer look and increased scratch resistance. One reviewer noted the prototype's rear sapphire caseback was too dark to appreciate the movement, and conspicuous text around the tourbillon window detracted from the dial.
The Glycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze is widely praised for its exceptional value, slim profile, and attractive aesthetic development, with owners frequently highlighting its comfortable wearability and unique design. Its thin case, around 10.4-10.5mm, is a recurring point of admiration, fitting easily under cuffs. The ETA 2824 or SW200 movement is noted as reliable, with one owner reporting accuracy of +1.9 seconds per day. Lume is generally considered strong, comparable to a Seiko SKX007, though one source noted it as subpar. Some owners expressed a desire for ceramic bezel inserts, while others preferred the aluminum for its thinner profile. A few specific criticisms include a non-bronze buckle, the potential for uneven patina from seawater exposure, and inconsistent power reserve not always reaching the advertised 42 hours. Overall, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub Vintage Bronze highly for its ruggedness and value, making it a compelling choice for a durable diver's watch.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









