Christopher Ward C1 MoonglowvsYema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
17 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward C1 Moonglow vs Yema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Christopher Ward C1 Moonglow for its gorgeous, avant-garde moonphase display and impressive lume, with many finding it comfortable and well-wearing. The constantly rotating moon phase complication is a highlight, and its accuracy is noted as exceptional. However, some find the lume on the date ring disappointing, fading quickly, and one owner finds the second, less visible moon distracting. Overall, owners rate the Christopher Ward C1 Moonglow highly for its visually engaging moonphase and value at the price point.
The Yema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20 is praised for its elegant and slim case design, measuring between 9.5mm and 9.75mm thick, and its unique mother-of-pearl dial and bezel. The watch features functional dive watch elements like 200-meter water resistance and is powered by the in-house CMM.20 micro-rotor movement, which offers a 70-hour power reserve and is adjusted to -3/+7 seconds a day. Overall, reviewers highlight the Yema Navygraf Pearl CMM.20's sophisticated aesthetic and slim profile as its primary strengths.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.