Christopher Ward The Twelve 660vsZelos Skyraider 40 Skeleton
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward The Twelve 660 vs Zelos Skyraider 40 Skeleton gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Christopher Ward The Twelve 660 owners and reviewers highlight its exceptionally thin 6.6mm case, achieved through a two-hand design, manual-wind movement, and 30m water resistance. The bracelet clasp, however, lacks micro-adjustments. Opinions are divided on the manual-wind nature and absence of a seconds hand, with some finding them unnecessary while others value the resulting slimness and winding experience. One user noted the logo as a drawback. Overall, the Christopher Ward The Twelve 660 is considered good value and well-made by the community, with its thinness being a primary draw.
The Zelos Skyraider 40 Skeleton is noted for its skeletonized dial and the use of BGW9 and C3 Super-LumiNova for legibility. It is powered by a manual-wind ETA 6498 movement, offering a 44-hour power reserve. On balance, the Zelos Skyraider 40 Skeleton is seen as a cool-looking option, though availability is a factor.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.