Which is cheaper, the Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 or the Henry Archer Relativ?

At MSRP the Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 is the cheaper of the two at $1,450, against $2,199 for the Henry Archer Relativ — a $749 gap before any retailer discounting.

Which has a longer power reserve, the Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 or the Henry Archer Relativ?

The Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 carries a 56-hour power reserve against 40 hours on the Henry Archer Relativ.

What movement does the Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 run compared to the Henry Archer Relativ?

The Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 runs a automatic caliber (SW330-2), while the Henry Archer Relativ runs a quartz.

Side by side

Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300vsHenry Archer Relativ

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300

C60-40AGM31S0BW0-RBB

MSRP $1,450

Henry Archer Relativ

HAC-REL-SKO-NRO

MSRP $2,199

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ

Diameter

C60 Trident GMT 30040mm

Relativ40mm

Power Reserve

C60 Trident GMT 30056h

Relativ40h

Water Resistance

C60 Trident GMT 300300m

Relativ—

MSRP

C60 Trident GMT 300$1,450

Relativ$2,199

Full specifications

Case

4 specs

Crystal & Dial

2 specs

Dial Color

White

Nero 40mm

Lume

SLN X1 BL C1

None

Movement

5 specs

Caliber

SW330-2

—

Type

Automatic

Quartz

Beat Rate

4 vph

28,800 vph

Power Reserve

56h

40h

Complications

GMT

None

Pricing

1 specs

MSRP

$1,450

$2,199

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 vs Henry Archer Relativ gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

Keep exploring