Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300vsSeiko Prospex Marinemaster Marinemaster 1965 Diver’s Modern Re-interpretation
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
14 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
5 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 vs Seiko Prospex Marinemaster Marinemaster 1965 Diver’s Modern Re-interpretation gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300's build quality and finishing, finding it a serious alternative to established Swiss brands. The 40mm size is considered comfortable with good wrist presence, and the lume is fantastic. The Sellita SW330-2 movement is noted as slim for a GMT, with one owner reporting accuracy of +5 seconds per week. Some owners dislike the older Bader bracelet and wish for better AR coating, while a reviewer noted the handset could be updated. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Christopher Ward C60 Trident GMT 300 highly for its exceptional build quality and finishing at its price point.
The Seiko Prospex Marinemaster Marinemaster 1965 Diver’s Modern Re-interpretation is noted for its refined, slimmed-down 39.5mm stainless steel case with a "super hard" coating and a box-shaped sapphire crystal. It offers 200 meters of water resistance and is powered by the slim Caliber 6L37 automatic movement, which has a 46-hour power reserve and an accuracy rating of -10/+15 seconds per day. Reviewers highlight its wearability and functionality as a dive watch, with one noting it as Seiko's thinnest diver ever at 12.3mm. However, concerns are raised about Seiko's continued reliance on the 62MAS design, with one reviewer wishing the Marinemaster remained a separate line, and the bracelet's end-links appearing mismatched in initial images. Its price of A$4,650 is considered high given its specifications compared to competitors.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











