Side by side

Christopher Ward C60 LympstonevsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

C60 Lympstone
Christopher WardC60 Lympstone
MSRP $1,615
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

14 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
C60 Lympstone40mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
C60 Lympstone38h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
C60 Lympstone600m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
C60 Lympstone$1,615
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
Diver
Dress
Diameter
40mm
38mm
Thickness
13.8mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
49.3mm
42mm
Lug Width
22mm
20mm
Water Resistance
600m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Black
Lume
SLN X1 GL C1
Luminova Punkten

Movement

5 specs
Caliber
SW200-1
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Beat Rate
4 vph
28,800 vph
Power Reserve
38h
Jewels
26

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,615
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Christopher Ward C60 Lympstone vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Christopher Ward C60 Lympstone

The Christopher Ward C60 Lympstone is praised for its unique matt crushed carbon fiber dial, described as meteor-like, and its gunmetal PVD case which resembles brushed stainless steel with a patina. Owners consistently highlight the excellent X1 lume, noting it glows brightly for an extended period. The watch features two large, easy-to-use screw-down crowns and an internal compass bezel. The PVD coating is reported to be intact and in excellent condition. Overall, owners highly rate the Christopher Ward C60 Lympstone for its distinctive dial and robust lume.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.