Dan Henry 1964vsHamilton Khaki Navy Scuba Automatic GMT 43mm Bronze
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Dan Henry 1964 vs Hamilton Khaki Navy Scuba Automatic GMT 43mm Bronze gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1964's 38mm case size as ideal for smaller wrists and its vintage panda execution as the best in its affordable price bracket, with build quality and finishing exceeding its $250 price point. Legibility is generally good, and the watch is considered excellent value. However, some owners report quality control issues like dust on the dial and crystal underside, sharp case edges, and subpar stock straps. The 19mm lug width limits strap options, and while the mineral crystal is durable for some, it is a concern for others. Subdial functions on the chronograph could be improved, and the date on the date version is hard to read. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1964 highly for its vintage panda execution and value at the $250 price point.
The Hamilton Khaki Navy Scuba Automatic GMT 43mm Bronze is widely praised for its excellent fit and finish, pleasing proportions with a 22mm lug width, and a matte dial that minimizes glare. Owners appreciate its 300 meters of water resistance, 80-hour power reserve from the H-14 automatic GMT movement, and the fact that it wears smaller than its 43mm size suggests. Some owners find the flush crown guards and rock-solid feel make it an outstanding beater dive watch. However, opinions are split on the date placement, dial markers, and logo text size, with some preferring a cleaner look and faster setting due to the lack of a date window, while others note the absence of a lumed bezel pip. One owner dislikes the trade-offs for the 80-hour power reserve, preferring a smoother second hand sweep and more torque, and finds the bezel action tight.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










