Side by side

Dan Henry 1972vsHenry Archer Øhav

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

1972
Dan Henry1972
MSRP $370
Øhav
Henry ArcherØhav
MSRP $5,499

At a glance

9 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
197241mm
Øhav40mm
Power Reserve
197240h
Øhav40h
Water Resistance
1972
Øhav200m
MSRP
1972$370
Øhav$5,499

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
Chronograph
Diver
Diameter
41mm
40mm
Thickness
12.7mm
11.45mm
Lug-to-Lug
45.7mm
47mm
Material
316L Stainless Steel
Titanium
Water Resistance
200m

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Dial Color
Black
Purple

Movement

1 specs
Caliber
Miyota 9019

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$370
$5,499

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Dan Henry 1972 vs Henry Archer Øhav gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Dan Henry 1972

Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1972 Maverick for its cool retro style, 12-hour chronograph, sapphire crystal, and comfortable 40mm-equivalent wearability. The distinct chrono pusher clicks and the unique ability to turn off the running seconds are also noted strengths. However, the lume is not bright or evenly applied, and the alarm feature is considered poorly executed, with a quiet, short-lived alarm and a difficult-to-use pusher. One owner reported a negative customer service experience involving a dead quartz movement. Overall, owners rate the Dan Henry 1972 highly for its retro styling and value despite noted shortcomings in its lume and alarm functionality.

Henry Archer Øhav

Owners widely praise the Henry Archer Øhav for its quality, finish, and dial that comes alive in direct light, with applied indices creating a depth effect and good lume. The watch achieves +0spd out of the box, and its mirror-polished rehaut is a highlight. However, the date window is consistently noted as very small and illegible, and one owner found the crown could be grippier, though winding is smooth. Some owners are disappointed that the dial effect is not as bright as website photos suggest and that the pattern is identical across colorways. On balance, owners rate the Henry Archer Øhav highly for its dial's depth effect and excellent out-of-the-box accuracy.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.