Side by side

Farer 36MM THREE HANDvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

36MM THREE HAND
Farer36MM THREE HAND
MSRP $925
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

11 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
36MM THREE HAND36mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
36MM THREE HAND68h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
36MM THREE HAND50m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
36MM THREE HAND$925
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

4 specs
Diameter
36mm
38mm
Thickness
12mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
41.2mm
42mm
Material
316L marine-grade stainless steel
Stainless Steel

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Black
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
La Joux-Perret G101
Seiko VJ76
Type
Solar
Power Reserve
68h
Jewels
24

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$925
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Farer 36MM THREE HAND vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Farer 36MM THREE HAND

The Farer 36MM THREE HAND is praised for its vibrant dials, compact 1960s-inspired design with fluid lines and slim bezel, and a 68-hour power reserve from its La Joux-Perret G101 automatic movement. Reviewers note the 39mm stainless steel case features polished finishes and brushed lugs, a screwed-down crown, and 100m water resistance. Some models include Super-LumiNova Arabic numerals and applied markers with syringe hands. One reviewer found the included red strap too thick and stiff, and the minute hashes difficult to read. On balance, reviewers highlight the unique dial colors and textures, along with the accessible price point, as key strengths of the Farer 36MM THREE HAND collection.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.