Duckworth Prestex Chronograph 42 QuartzvsEza 1972 Diver
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Duckworth Prestex Chronograph 42 Quartz for its attractive design, comfortable wearability, and solid build quality, with some noting it as a strong alternative to other luxury brands. One owner finds the cushion case, small seconds, and Arabic numerals particularly gorgeous, while another appreciates the unique "7 numeral" design. The sub-$600 price point is considered a slight drawback by one owner who wished it were cheaper. Overall, owners rate the Duckworth Prestex Chronograph 42 Quartz highly for its aesthetic appeal and perceived value.
Owners widely praise the Eza 1972 Diver for its faithful vintage design, thin 39.6mm case, and excellent value, with one owner noting it surpasses other watches in bezel action, crown comfort, and packaging. The Sellita SW200-1 movement is reported to be exceptionally accurate, running at nearly 0 seconds per day. Some find the bezel action stiff. Overall, owners rate the Eza 1972 Diver highly for its exceptional vintage aesthetic and value proposition.
At a glance
9 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsMore watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Follow this matchup
Get a note when Duckworth Prestex Chronograph 42 Quartz vs Eza 1972 Diver gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.














