Side by side

Farer WORLD TIMERvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

WORLD TIMER
FarerWORLD TIMER
MSRP $1,575
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
WORLD TIMER39mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
WORLD TIMER56h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
WORLD TIMER100m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
WORLD TIMER$1,575
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
World Timer
Dress
Diameter
39mm
38mm
Thickness
12mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
45mm
42mm
Material
316L marine-grade stainless steel with gold PVD coating
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
100m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Green
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW331-2
Seiko VJ76
Type
Solar
Power Reserve
56h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,575
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Farer WORLD TIMER vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Farer WORLD TIMER

Owners widely praise the Farer WORLD TIMER for its detailed dial work, including bronze inlay patina and shiny minute markers, as well as its powerful lume and gorgeous case finishing. The 39mm sizing is considered perfect by some reviewers, offering a blend of function and elegance that punches above its price point, while others find the matching blue dial hinders legibility. One owner noted the bracelet lacked microadjusts. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Farer WORLD TIMER highly for its detailed dial work and versatile case finishing at its price.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.