Glycine Combat SubvsMKII Project 300
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Glycine Combat Sub for its exceptional thinness, with many noting its 10.4mm to 10.8mm profile for a diver, perfect proportions, and solid build quality that offers significant value, especially at discounted prices. Its unique aesthetic is appreciated for avoiding homage looks, and the lug design contributes to a smaller perceived wear size despite its 42mm case. Some owners report an inconsistent power reserve and sub-par lume that can be difficult to read at night, while one owner noted a slightly off-color lume pip on the chapter ring. Overall, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub highly for its refined feel, slim profile, and value proposition.
Owners widely praise the MKII Project 300 for its balanced aesthetic, with one owner noting its lume "glows like a torch." Reviewers highlight its design as a dive watch inspired by the Omega Seamaster 300, emphasizing high legibility with a bold yet balanced appearance. One owner found the 41.25mm case fit their wrist perfectly. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the MKII Project 300 highly for its striking lume and well-proportioned dive watch design.
At a glance
18 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsMore watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Follow this matchup
Get a note when Glycine Combat Sub vs MKII Project 300 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.











