Glycine Combat Sub Box CeramicvsRaven Trekker

Owners widely praise the Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic for its exceptional thinness at 10.4mm for a 42mm diver, perfect proportions for small wrists, and unique, non-homage aesthetic, with some considering it the best dive watch under $400 due to its superior finishing and value. The case shape, dimensions, and drilled lugs are also highlighted as positives, and the dial is legible with good lume on the hands. However, reviewers and owners consistently flag sub-par lume on the markers that fades quickly, and an inconsistent power reserve. Some owners report the stock strap or bracelet is subpar, and one owner experienced the bezel detaching after a light bump, questioning build quality. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner noting it runs about 2.5 seconds fast per day, while another reports an inconsistent power reserve. On balance, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic highly for its thinness, unique design, and value, despite concerns about lume and strap quality.

Owners widely praise the Raven Trekker for its classic yet unique design, excellent bracelet, killer BGW9 lume, and overall value, with many finding the 39mm case size perfect and appreciating its blend of explorer and dive watch aesthetics. Reviewers and owners consistently flag the tight, play-free bezel action and the crisp, legible dial. Some owners note the Miyota 9015 movement's rotor can exhibit wobble, the crown threads can feel grindy, and the bracelet's solid end links can be difficult to reinsert, with one owner finding the 2022 bracelet too simple. Overall, owners rate the Raven Trekker highly for its exceptional value and tool-watch build at the price point.