Side by side

Hamilton Khaki Field QuartzvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Khaki Field Quartz
HamiltonKhaki Field Quartz
MSRP $675
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

11 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Khaki Field Quartz40mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Khaki Field Quartz40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Khaki Field Quartz50m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Khaki Field Quartz$675
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

4 specs
Category
Field
Dress
Diameter
40mm
38mm
Thickness
9.6mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
42mm

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Black
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
F07.111
Seiko VJ76
Type
Quartz
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$675
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Hamilton Khaki Field Quartz vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Hamilton Khaki Field Quartz

The Hamilton Khaki Field Quartz is praised for its clean design, fair value at $395, and historical recall with 33mm sizing, though this optimization slightly diminishes vintage charm. It features a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal and 50m water resistance, available in 33mm and 38mm sizes. One critique notes that fixed keepers on the NATO straps can leave excess strap material protruding on larger wrists. Overall, reviewers highlight the Hamilton Khaki Field Quartz as a fun, carefree grab-and-go watch with a well-executed design.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.