Hamilton Khaki Aviation X-Wind Day Date AutovsTissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
10 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Hamilton Khaki Aviation X-Wind Day Date Auto vs Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Hamilton Khaki Aviation X-Wind Day Date Auto for its value, technical aesthetic, and versatile wearability with straps. Reviewers and owners alike highlight its excellent legibility, bold Arabic numerals, and the appeal of its pilot watch design, with many appreciating the 80-hour power reserve. Some owners find the crosswind calculation functions unnecessary, and there are mixed views on the dial's font usage and color matching. Lume is frequently noted as weak, and some find the size large or the left-handed crown and pusher setup uncomfortable. Accuracy figures range from gaining 6 seconds in a few days to approximately -6 seconds per day. Overall, owners rate the Hamilton Khaki Aviation X-Wind Day Date Auto highly for its impressive value and functional pilot watch design.
Owners widely praise the Tissot Seastar 1000 Powermatic 80 GMT for its excellent build quality, smooth winding feel, and the reliable Powermatic 80 movement providing an 80-hour power reserve. Reviewers highlight its remarkable value under $700, comfortable wearability, and appealing case/dial ratio. Some owners note the bezel's functionality for tracking a second time zone and the need to adjust the hour hand for date setting, a characteristic of its "True" GMT function. The rubber strap is considered comparable to those found on significantly more expensive watches. However, concerns exist regarding the movement's serviceability due to potential plastic components and reliance on Swatch Group service centers. Some find the bezel font and dial spacing unappealing, while others question the mineral glass bezel insert as a cost-cutting measure compared to ceramic. Accuracy is generally reported as good, though not COSC certified, and lume intensity is described as average by one owner.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.












