Side by side

Farer GMTvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

GMT
FarerGMT
MSRP $1,375
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
GMT36mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
GMT56h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
GMT100m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
GMT$1,375
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
GMT
Dress
Diameter
36mm
38mm
Thickness
12mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
41.2mm
42mm
Material
316L marine-grade stainless steel
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
100m
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Green
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW330-2
Seiko VJ76
Type
Solar
Power Reserve
56h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,375
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Farer GMT vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Farer GMT

The Farer GMT Automatic is praised for its vibrant, legible sea-green sunburst dial and well-proportioned 39.5mm, 10mm thin case. The Top Grade ETA 2893-2 movement offers hacking seconds and a 42-hour power reserve. Reviewers note the bronze crown, intended to develop patina, as a potentially unpopular design choice. Overall, reviewers consider the Farer GMT Automatic good value at its price point, highlighting the dial and case proportions as key strengths.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.