Side by side

Farer GMTvsSeiko Astron

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

GMT
FarerGMT
MSRP $1,375
Astron
SeikoAstron
MSRP $2,500

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
GMT36mm
Astron42mm
Power Reserve
GMT56h
Astron40h
Water Resistance
GMT100m
Astron100m
MSRP
GMT$1,375
Astron$2,500

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Diameter
36mm
42mm
Thickness
12mm
12.4mm
Lug-to-Lug
41.2mm
49.5mm
Lug Width
20mm
14mm
Material
316L marine-grade stainless steel
Titanium

Crystal & Dial

3 specs
AR Coating
Inner
Super-clear coating
Dial Color
Green
Black
Lume
None
LumiBrite on hands and index(es)

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW330-2
5X83
Type
Quartz
Power Reserve
56h
40h
Jewels
25
14

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,375
$2,500

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Farer GMT vs Seiko Astron gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Farer GMT

The Farer GMT Automatic is praised for its vibrant, legible sea-green sunburst dial and well-proportioned 39.5mm, 10mm thin case. The Top Grade ETA 2893-2 movement offers hacking seconds and a 42-hour power reserve. Reviewers note the bronze crown, intended to develop patina, as a potentially unpopular design choice. Overall, reviewers consider the Farer GMT Automatic good value at its price point, highlighting the dial and case proportions as key strengths.

Seiko Astron

Owners widely praise the Seiko Astron for its spectacular technology, solar-powered quartz movement, and GPS time synchronization, making it a convenient grab-and-go option. The watch is frequently noted for its comfortable and lightweight titanium build, with some models featuring well-finished cases and robust ceramic bezels. Reviewers and owners alike highlight the dial's dynamic and shiny appearance, with textured hour markers and high-contrast edges. Accuracy is generally considered good, with figures ranging from +/- 15 seconds per month to within 1/2 second per day, easily corrected by GPS signal. However, some owners note that DST requires manual adjustment and that automatic time syncing depends on proximity to radio wave towers. The price point is a concern for some, who feel it competes with luxury watches without the same aesthetic appeal. One owner pointed out minimal lume and a slight misalignment of the minute hand on their model.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.