Side by side

Farer GMTvsSeiko Coutura

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

GMT
FarerGMT
MSRP $1,375
Coutura
SeikoCoutura
MSRP $595

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
GMT39.5mm
Coutura42.5mm
Power Reserve
GMT56h
Coutura40h
Water Resistance
GMT100m
Coutura100m
MSRP
GMT$1,375
Coutura$595

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
GMT
Dress
Diameter
39.5mm
42.5mm
Thickness
12mm
10.2mm
Lug-to-Lug
45mm
46mm
Lug Width
20mm
12mm
Material
316L marine-grade stainless steel
Stainless Steel

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Blue
Black
Lume
None
LumiBrite on hands and index(es)

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW330-2
V157
Type
Quartz
Power Reserve
56h
40h
Jewels
25
2

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$1,375
$595

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Farer GMT vs Seiko Coutura gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Farer GMT

The Farer GMT Automatic is praised for its vibrant, legible sunburst dial and well-proportioned 39.5mm x 10mm case. Reviewers note the ETA 2893-2 movement as a good choice with hacking seconds and a 42-hour power reserve. The bronze crown, intended to develop a patina, is flagged as a potentially unpopular design element that some feel looks unfinished or out of place. Prices range from $1,425 to $2,150 AUD. Overall, reviewers find the Farer GMT Automatic offers good value for a GMT watch in its price segment, with the dial and case proportions being key strengths.

Seiko Coutura

Seiko Coutura owners widely praise its wear-resistant metal treatments, with one reporting minimal scratches after six years. The watch is also lauded for its solar and perpetual calendar features, offering a "set it and forget it" experience with 100m water resistance. Owners appreciate its weight and captivating appearance, with one purchasing it for $410.88. The aesthetic, featuring contrasting gold indices and hands against a black dial, is considered appealing by some, particularly those who enjoy its unique and fun design. However, opinions on styling are divided, with some finding the dial too busy and gaudy, and others describing the line as large or sitting too high. The proprietary bracelet is also noted as a downside by some owners. One owner reports the solar power reserve can be problematic if not exposed to light regularly, while another calls their kinetic perpetual a beautiful keeper with a 4-year reserve.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.