Lorier MerlinvsLongines LONGINES SPIRIT FLYBACK PROTOTYPE
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
9 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Lorier Merlin vs LONGINES SPIRIT FLYBACK PROTOTYPE gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Lorier Merlin for its vintage-inspired 37mm case, heat-blued hands, raised numerals, and hesalite crystal. The watch is noted for its comfortable wear, with some finding it wears large despite its size and even thinner on a two-piece strap. Drilled lug holes and a locking bezel are also appreciated features. Accuracy varies, with one owner reporting +8 seconds per day, while others do not specify. Some owners find the dual-crown design unappealing or the case chunky, with the 37mm size feeling small for a dive bezel watch, though others find it perfect for smaller wrists. The supplied strap and its hardware are considered cheap by one owner, and the bezel action is described as light and hollow. A desire for a sapphire crystal option at the price point is mentioned by some, while others prefer the hesalite for its vintage look. On balance, owners and the community rate the Lorier Merlin highly for its authentic vintage aesthetic and comfortable wear.
Owners widely praise the Longines Spirit Flyback Prototype for its attractive finishing, COSC-certified movement, and value as a flyback chronograph. Reviewers highlight its refined 39.5mm case and simplified dial, while some owners appreciate the reduced thickness and improved wearability compared to larger variants, with a lug-to-lug distance noted as potentially long for smaller wrists. The watch features a 68-hour power reserve and a bespoke L791.4 movement. However, the case thickness is a consistent point of discussion, with multiple sources citing 17mm, though some reviewers suggest thoughtful design makes it wear closer to 13.5-14mm. Owners are split on the dial's aesthetic, with some preferring previous configurations with gold subdial rings and concentric textures over the current flat matte dial and cut-off numbers. The leather strap is also noted as stiff and pinching.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.












