Side by side

Lorier Olympia SIIvsTudor 1926 41mm Automatic

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Olympia SII
LorierOlympia SII
MSRP $999
1926 41mm Automatic
Tudor1926 41mm Automatic
MSRP $2,650

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Olympia SII39mm
1926 41mm Automatic41mm
Power Reserve
Olympia SII40h
1926 41mm Automatic38h
Water Resistance
Olympia SII
1926 41mm Automatic100m
MSRP
Olympia SII$999
1926 41mm Automatic$2,650

Full specifications

Case

8 specs
Category
Chronograph
Dress
Diameter
39mm
41mm
Thickness
9.1mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
Lug Width
20mm
15mm
Finish
Brushed and polished
Polished
Water Resistance
100m
Caseback
Solid
Solid screw-down

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Dial Color
Standard
Silver

Movement

3 specs
Caliber
T601
Type
Manual
Automatic
Power Reserve
40h
38h

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$999
$2,650

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Lorier Olympia SII vs Tudor 1926 41mm Automatic gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Lorier Olympia SII

Owners widely praise the Lorier Olympia SII for its excellent value and vintage aesthetic, highlighting the robust Seiko NE88 movement and crisp chronograph pushers. The 39mm case is noted for wearing well, with its layered design effectively managing the 13.8mm thickness. Some owners prefer the hesalite crystal for its aesthetic, while others would like a sapphire option. The bracelet is described as functional but can be a hair nipper. Overall, owners rate the Lorier Olympia SII highly for its execution of a vintage chronograph at an accessible price point.

Tudor 1926 41mm Automatic

Owners widely praise the Tudor 1926 41mm Automatic for its thin profile, comfortable wearability, and excellent value, with many appreciating its versatile strap potential and elegant aesthetic suitable for both dressy and everyday occasions. Reviewers and owners alike note its superb case and bracelet quality, improved finishing, and legibility compared to some alternatives, with some finding its 100m water resistance a practical benefit. However, the 42-hour power reserve necessitates regular winding, and some owners express a desire for an in-house movement, while others find the design bland or unoriginal, and the bracelet a weak point. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner reporting it not as accurate as their Pelagos, while another notes Tudor regulates its third-party movement to COSC standards.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.