Side by side

Magrette Moana Pacific Waterman GMTvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Moana Pacific Waterman GMT
MagretteMoana Pacific Waterman GMT
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Moana Pacific Waterman GMT42mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Moana Pacific Waterman GMT
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Moana Pacific Waterman GMT500m
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Moana Pacific Waterman GMT
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

7 specs
Category
GMT
Dress
Diameter
42mm
38mm
Thickness
14.5mm
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
50.7mm
42mm
Lug Width
22mm
20mm
Material
Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
500m
50m

Crystal & Dial

1 specs
Lume
SuperLuminova
Luminova Punkten

Movement

3 specs
Caliber
ETA Caliber 2893-2
Seiko VJ76
Type
Automatic
Solar
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Magrette Moana Pacific Waterman GMT vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Magrette Moana Pacific Waterman GMT

Owners and reviewers widely praise the Magrette Moana Pacific Waterman GMT for its attractive, retro-inspired design and excellent value. The 42mm case size is noted as appealing for those who find larger watches uncomfortable. Some find the second hand style visually perplexing, and one owner dislikes the unidirectional bezel. Accuracy figures range from -5s/d. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Magrette Moana Pacific Waterman GMT highly for its attractive design and value proposition.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.