Marathon Jeep Rubicon GSARvsLongines RECORD
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
21 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
5 specsMovement
7 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Marathon Jeep Rubicon GSAR vs Longines RECORD gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Marathon Jeep Rubicon GSAR is widely praised as a rugged, high-quality tool watch that successfully blends Jeep branding with Marathon's functional heritage, featuring a unique dial with tritium illumination and an automatic Sellita SW200-1 movement. Owners appreciate its satisfying bezel action and durable build, making it a reliable daily wear that pairs well with Jeep's rugged image. However, some find the Jeep logo to be corporate and out of place with Marathon's austere design ethos, while one owner notes that second-hand examples can show wear on the bezel. The watch is priced at $1,500 USD. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Marathon Jeep Rubicon GSAR highly for its robust construction and distinctive tritium lume, which are considered its strongest assets.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the Longines RECORD for its COSC-certified L888.4 movement, often noting its excellent accuracy, with one owner reporting figures between 0 and +2 seconds per day and another experiencing -5 seconds per day in its worst position. The watch is frequently highlighted for its comfortable, thin case, described as elegant and well-balanced, with specific mentions of the clean dial design, applied numerals, and sharp blue hands. Some owners find the Roman numeral font exceptional and the watch a great value for its price. However, several sources point out a lack of micro-adjustment on the bracelet and no lume, with 30m water resistance also noted as minimal. One reviewer found the 40mm size with a 13.8mm thickness cumbersome and its legibility terrible due to the handset and dial printing, while another owner felt the watch wore larger than expected.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









