Mr Jones Watches Beam me up! mechanicalvsStudio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
4 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
2 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Mr Jones Watches Beam me up! mechanical vs Studio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Mr Jones Watches Beam me up! mechanical for its fun, unique, and conversation-starting design, with many appreciating its art value and the handmade production. Some owners specifically enjoy the blue dial and brown strap combination. However, legibility can be an issue due to the unique dial layout, and some commenters dislike the case and lugs, with a few finding the lugs long. One owner notes that sun exposure may affect the accuracy of the plastic discs. Overall, owners rate the Mr Jones Watches Beam me up! mechanical highly for its unique artistic design and conversation-starting appeal.
The Studio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar is a polarizing monopusher chronograph with a unique dial design inspired by luxury food and drink, featuring a textured champagne top dial and a caviar-themed subdial. Owners and reviewers are split on its aesthetic, with some calling the design "so fucking bad" and "gross," while others appreciate its "awesome" concept. It is powered by a manual-wind Sellita SW510M Elaboré movement with a 63-hour power reserve and is rated at ±5 seconds per day, housed in a 38.5mm stainless steel case and priced at $2,200. On balance, the Studio Underd0g Champagne & Caviar is a unique but divisive chronograph, with its polarizing design being the primary point of contention among enthusiasts and reviewers.
The Studio Underd0g Standard's Sellita SW210-1 automatic movement offers a 42-hour power reserve. The watch's build quality is a notable weakness, with reviewers mentioning that it's not as well-polished as its competitors. Reviewers disagree on the watch's value, with one reviewer comparing it to the Gibson Les Paul and another noting its price is more accessible than the standard Brunswick.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.