Side by side

Sternglas Naos Pro GMT AutomatikvsVaer Calendar Field

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Naos Pro GMT Automatik
SternglasNaos Pro GMT Automatik
MSRP $863
Calendar Field
VaerCalendar Field
MSRP $189

At a glance

13 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Naos Pro GMT Automatik38mm
Calendar Field36mm
Power Reserve
Naos Pro GMT Automatik42h
Calendar Field40h
Water Resistance
Naos Pro GMT Automatik50m
Calendar Field100m
MSRP
Naos Pro GMT Automatik$863
Calendar Field$189

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Category
GMT
Field
Diameter
38mm
36mm
Thickness
11mm
8.4mm
Lug-to-Lug
42mm
43mm
Material
Stainless Steel
316L Stainless Steel
Water Resistance
50m
100m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Black
Lume
Luminova Punkte
None

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Miyota 9075
Miyota 2035
Type
Automatic
Quartz
Power Reserve
42h
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$863
$189

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Sternglas Naos Pro GMT Automatik vs Vaer Calendar Field gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Sternglas Naos Pro GMT Automatik

Owners report the Sternglas Naos can feel underwhelming with a cheap feel and hands resembling office printer output, with some finding it wears smaller than expected and looks like a toy, though others appreciate its understated design. Reviewers highlight the Argo Automatic variant as a compelling sub-€400 mechanical watch with a colorful dial and practical date wheel, suitable for new collectors, featuring a 38mm case and a Miyota 8215 movement. On balance, the consensus is that the Sternglas Naos offers a mixed ownership experience, with its value proposition and entry-level appeal being its strongest points for some.

From video reviewers

The Sternglas Naos Pro GMT Automatik features a clean Bauhaus design that sets it apart from other GMT watches. A notable weakness is the watch's bezel action, which is not as smooth as some reviewers would have liked. Reviewers disagree on the watch's case size, with one reviewer stating it's slightly larger than the original Naos Automatic, while another reviewer doesn't mention this aspect at all.

Vaer Calendar Field

Owners widely praise the Vaer Calendar Field for its excellent value, citing its clean WWII-inspired dial, thin 8.5mm to 9.5mm case, sapphire crystal, and 100m water resistance. The dial and hand design are consistently highlighted as phenomenal, with case finishing described as next-level for the price, featuring nice brushing. Some owners note the second hand does not perfectly align with markers, and the stock silicone strap attracts lint. One owner found the lume only serviceable and wished the date window was brighter. On balance, owners rate the Vaer Calendar Field highly for its exceptional dial design and case finishing at its price point.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.