Side by side

Grand Seiko SBGP009vsSeiko Astron

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

SBGP009
Grand SeikoSBGP009
MSRP $3,100
Astron
SeikoAstron
MSRP $2,400

At a glance

10 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
SBGP00940mm
Astron42mm
Power Reserve
SBGP00940h
Astron40h
Water Resistance
SBGP009100m
Astron100m
MSRP
SBGP009$3,100
Astron$2,400

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Diameter
40mm
42mm
Thickness
10.6mm
12mm
Lug-to-Lug
47mm
47.9mm
Lug Width
20mm
14mm
Material
Stainless Steel
Titanium

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
AR Coating
Yes
Super-clear coating
Lume
None
LumiBrite on hands and index(es)

Movement

2 specs
Caliber
9F85
3X62
Jewels
25
10

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$3,100
$2,400

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Grand Seiko SBGP009 vs Seiko Astron gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Grand Seiko SBGP009

Grand Seiko SBGP009 owners note its "normal quartz" movement, and one owner criticizes the bracelet for lacking a taper. One owner cites a 40-year-old Seiko quartz watch that has only required battery changes as evidence of the reliability of Grand Seiko's quartz movements. On balance, owners value the Grand Seiko SBGP009 for its perceived long-term reliability.

Seiko Astron

The Seiko Astron is widely praised for its advanced time-telling technology, including GPS and radio wave synchronization, and its self-sufficient solar-powered quartz movement. Owners appreciate the detailed and high-contrast dials, comfortable and lightweight titanium builds, and well-finished cases and bracelets. Some users report excellent accuracy, with one noting +/- 15 seconds per month, while another finds the autonomous movement's accuracy of 1/2 second per day acceptable due to easy correction via GPS sync. However, the Seiko Astron's price point is frequently cited as a drawback, with some finding it high for a quartz watch, particularly when compared to luxury or mechanical alternatives. Specific criticisms include manual DST implementation, the need for outdoor sync, sparse lume, and a minute hand that sits slightly off on one model, with accuracy of +13 sec/month being disappointing for its cost on another.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.