CIGA Design SKELETONvsTornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when CIGA Design SKELETON vs Tornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the CIGA Design SKELETON for its value and willingness to challenge established brands, with some surprised by its quality. One owner reports their CIGA Design Series Z in Black DLC has been perfect for over four years, keeping good time and looking neat. However, some find the skeletonized movement's visibility obscured by reflections due to the lack of anti-reflective coating on the crystal. One owner reported their CIGA Design Z Series Skeleton broke after three months with no customer service response. Overall, owners rate the CIGA Design SKELETON highly for its surprising quality and value proposition.
Owners praise the Tornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date for its crisp dial and bead-blasted case, with one owner finding it extremely well built and a relief to wear. The watch features a 40mm 316L stainless steel case and a black aluminum bezel inlay. However, the bezel action is considered not brilliant and the included straps are scratchy. Overall, owners find the Tornek-Rayville TR-660 Aluminum Non-date to be a well-executed piece with a pleasing aesthetic, despite minor drawbacks in the bezel feel and strap quality.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.









