DOXA SUB 200 T.GRAPHvsYema Flygraf CPA10
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
9 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
1 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when DOXA SUB 200 T.GRAPH vs Yema Flygraf CPA10 gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the DOXA SUB 200 for its value, heritage, and field durability, with many appreciating its wearable 39mm size and thin 10.70mm case. However, community feedback is split on the bracelet and clasp quality, with some finding them cheap and others very good, and lume is consistently noted as functional but not exceptional. One owner of the T-Graph variant flagged its massive 45mm size and polarizing aesthetic, while another reviewer noted the T.Graph's faithful reissue of a vintage chronograph with a Valjoux 7734 movement. Overall, owners rate the DOXA SUB 200 highly for its blend of heritage, wearability, and value, despite some reservations about the clasp and lume.
Owners widely praise the Yema Flygraf CPA10 for its light 40mm titanium case, slim 9.4mm profile, and excellent legibility on its blue brushed dial with applied Super-LumiNova markers. The Yema CMM.10 automatic movement is considered terrific, offering chronometric precision of -3/+5 seconds per day and a 70-hour power reserve. Some owners appreciate the aluminum warranty card and packaging as nice touches. The watch is priced at €1,690. One owner noted concerns about the long-term reliability of older in-house movements due to mixed origins, though praised customer service under new management. Overall, owners rate the Yema Flygraf CPA10 highly for its comfortable wearability and attractive, legible dial design.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










