Fears Redcliff (Edwin Edition)vsBoldr Safari
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
6 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Fears Redcliff (Edwin Edition) vs Boldr Safari gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Fears Redcliff (Edwin Edition) is praised for its slim, sporty, and versatile design, featuring a well-finished 39.5mm case with a 9.95mm thickness and 150m water resistance. It is powered by a La Joux-Perret G100 automatic movement offering a 68-hour power reserve, tested to -/+7 seconds per day. The dial features contemporary baton markers and Super-LumiNova filled hands and markers. Overall, reviewers highlight the watch's refined build and sporty reimagining of the brand's debut model.
Owners widely praise the Boldr Safari for its attractive dials, robust build with 200 meters of water resistance, and reliable Seiko movements. The California dial design is a frequent highlight, as is the strong lume. Some owners note the GMT variant offers full GMT functionality, while others point out the movement's date-only nature on certain models leads to a vestigial crown position. The animal artwork on the display caseback is a point of contention, with some finding it detracts from the view of the movement. Overall, owners rate the Boldr Safari highly for its value and distinctive design elements.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










