Furlan Marri FlybackvsSternglas Naos Solar
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
At a glance
11 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
3 specsCrystal & Dial
3 specsMovement
4 specsPricing
1 specsFollow this matchup
Get a note when Furlan Marri Flyback vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
The Furlan Marri Flyback is widely praised for its vintage-inspired design, 38mm case size, and elegant sector dials, with several sources highlighting its exceptional value proposition. Owners and reviewers consistently commend the watch's classical dimensions and thinness, particularly the 10.9mm thickness mentioned by one source. The Sellita AMT5100 movement, featuring a flyback function and column-wheel, is noted for its decoration and reliability, offering a power reserve around 58-63 hours. Readability is also a strong point, with one reference specifically mentioning the taupe dial's excellent contrast. However, one reviewer flags the pushers as appearing small, and another criticizes the case thickness exceeding 13mm, describing it as a "hamburger-on-wrist" despite efforts to mitigate the bulk with a short lug-to-lug and domed crystal. Overall, owners and reviewers rate the Furlan Marri Flyback highly for its sophisticated vintage aesthetics and strong value at its price point.
The Furlan Marri Flyback features a custom Swiss-made movement with a column wheel and flyback complication. The 18K rose gold plating adds a premium touch. The watch is available in three dial variations.
Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.
More watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.










