Side by side

Lorier Olympia SIIvsSternglas Naos Solar

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Olympia SII
LorierOlympia SII
MSRP $999
Naos Solar
SternglasNaos Solar
MSRP $323

At a glance

12 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Olympia SII39mm
Naos Solar38mm
Power Reserve
Olympia SII40h
Naos Solar
Water Resistance
Olympia SII
Naos Solar50m
MSRP
Olympia SII$999
Naos Solar$323

Full specifications

Case

5 specs
Category
Chronograph
Dress
Diameter
39mm
38mm
Thickness
10mm
Lug-to-Lug
42mm
Water Resistance
50m

Crystal & Dial

2 specs
Dial Color
Standard
Lume
None
Luminova Punkten

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Seiko VJ76
Type
Manual
Solar
Power Reserve
40h
Jewels
25

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$999
$323

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Lorier Olympia SII vs Sternglas Naos Solar gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Lorier Olympia SII

Owners widely praise the Lorier Olympia SII for its excellent value and vintage aesthetic, highlighting the robust Seiko NE88 movement and crisp chronograph pushers. The 39mm case is noted for wearing well, with its layered design effectively managing the 13.8mm thickness. Some owners prefer the hesalite crystal for its aesthetic, while others would like a sapphire option. The bracelet is described as functional but can be a hair nipper. Overall, owners rate the Lorier Olympia SII highly for its execution of a vintage chronograph at an accessible price point.

Sternglas Naos Solar

Owners widely praise the Sternglas Naos Solar for its elegant Bauhaus-inspired minimalist dial, slim profile, and value for money. The scratch-resistant curved sapphire crystal and functional date mechanism are noted as durable features, with one owner reporting good wear over a year. The solar power and accuracy are highlighted as practical advantages over automatic movements, which some find loud. However, opinions are split, with some owners finding the watch underwhelming and cheap-looking, like a toy, while others love its appearance in person and its clean, appealing design as a smartwatch alternative. The stock leather strap is described as decent but basic and potentially short for larger wrists, with one owner advising a third-party replacement for durability. One owner of a different variant noted the date font is too small to be useful.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.