Maen Classic 36vsSignum Cuda GMT

Owners widely praise the Maen Classic 36 for its salmon dial and clean moon phase, with its radial brushing also noted as a positive design element. One owner reports excellent quality, drawing from experience with a sibling model. A concern exists regarding the inability to try on microbrand watches before purchase to assess value. One owner experienced a non-functional watch upon arrival. Overall, owners value the Maen Classic 36 for its attractive dial and design elements, though a significant quality control issue was reported by one owner.

Owners widely praise the Signum Cuda GMT for its striking Lapis Lazuli and thermally blued meteorite dials, with one owner finding the meteorite dial's light play stunning. The watch is also lauded for its exceptional lume, with one user reporting it "glows for hours and hours" and outperforms many more expensive watches. However, a significant concern raised by multiple owners is the weak lume on the hands, which is noted as being significantly weaker than the dial. One owner reported crystal fogging during kayaking, suggesting a failure of the 200m water resistance, and expressed dissatisfaction with the brand's response and warranty. The bezel action was initially stiff for one owner but improved after oiling. The 42.5mm titanium case features a scratch-resistant coating. Overall, owners are divided, with some praising the unique dials and strong lume while others cite concerns about hand lume and water resistance.