Tudor on the secondhand market
Every Tudor listing our crawlers matched to a catalog reference on r/Watchexchange and WatchUSeek. A brand moves as one cluster, so a brand cut carries much less independent information than its count suggests — which is why most brands publish a range instead of a single figure.
Enough watches for a range, not enough for a number. A brand moves as one cluster, which costs a brand cut most of the independence its count suggests.
Year by year
| Year | Change | Reading | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so farrevises | Range only, no centre38 watches · 1,584 asks+1.1% to +8.4% vs the index | +8.5% to +16.6% | |
| 2025 | Range only, no centre35 watches · 1,458 asks-0.1% to +8.6% vs the index | -0.3% to +10.2% | |
| 2024 | Range only, no centre31 watches · 964 asks-7.5% to +1.1% vs the index | -10.2% to -2.1% | |
| 2023 | Not enough to call it22 watches · 810 asks | — |
Each year is compared with the one before it, over the watches listed in both. Nothing before 2022 is drawn: the older forum threads still standing are the ones nobody pruned, and the direction of that bias is unknown.
The closing-ask cross-check
A second panel, built separately from the last price a seller asked before their listing closed. A closed listing may have been withdrawn rather than bought, so this is never a sale price and the two panels are never blended.
The panel
One vote per watch, never weighted by price. A dollar-weighted index of this panel would just be a tracker for whichever brand lists the most expensive watches.
Browse these watches
Catalog pages, not the index panel. The figures above are the panel’s; these are the watches in the same group.
Other brands
One brand moves as one cluster, so most brand cuts publish a range rather than a number.
Every other cut
How this is measured
These are asking prices, not sale prices. A sale price is never observed here. Both panels are published separately and are never blended.
Matched model. A year’s change is the average change across watches listed in both that year and the one before, one vote per watch.
It follows the same watches getting older. A matched-model index of used goods carries some drift from age alone, and that drift is not measured out. Read it as what an owner holding these watches saw, not as what a model is worth new.