Dan Henry 1964vsTimefactors Speedbird III PRS-22
The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.
Some links are affiliate links — lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Owners + reviewers, side by side
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Dan Henry 1964's 38mm case size as ideal for smaller wrists and its vintage panda execution as the best in its affordable price bracket, with build quality and finishing exceeding its $250 price point. Legibility is generally good, and the watch is considered excellent value. However, some owners report quality control issues like dust on the dial and crystal underside, sharp case edges, and subpar stock straps. The 19mm lug width limits strap options, and while the mineral crystal is durable for some, it is a concern for others. Subdial functions on the chronograph could be improved, and the date on the date version is hard to read. On balance, owners rate the Dan Henry 1964 highly for its vintage panda execution and value at the $250 price point.
The 38mm vintage-inspired case size is a strength. The price point is a weakness.
Owners widely praise the Timefactors Speedbird III PRS-22 for its exceptional finishing, casework, and value, with multiple owners calling it the finest watch under $1000 and noting its quality rivals that of IWC. Specific highlights include applied indices, a screw-down crown, and a comfortable bracelet. Some owners report the lume fades quickly, and the short lugs can make strap changes difficult. The watch features a Sellita SW200-1 automatic movement and a 39mm case. Overall, owners rate the Timefactors Speedbird III PRS-22 highly for its impressive build quality and design at its price point.
At a glance
12 of 29 specs differFull specifications
Case
7 specsCrystal & Dial
1 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsMore watches worth a look
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
People also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.














