Echo/Neutra 1956 3HvsGlycine Combat Sub Vintage
lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.
1956 3H
Combat Sub Vintage
Diameter
40mm
42mm
Lug-to-Lug
46mm
n/a
Thickness
11.9mm
lowest
12.5mm
Water Resistance
100m
200m
highest
Power Reserve
41h
highest
38h
MSRP
$1,025
$540
lowest
Movement
Sellita SW200-1
Sellita SW200-1
Case
8 specsCrystal & Dial
4 specsMovement
3 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Echo/Neutra 1956 3H for its exceptionally well-executed bracelet, with one owner comparing it favorably to a Rolex Oyster. The watch is noted for its unique blend of vintage tool-watch and mid-century design, featuring a dramatic box-domed sapphire crystal and a gray dial that exceeds build quality expectations. Legibility in low light presents a challenge due to the fixed, lumed bezel and non-lumed dial, and some may find the branding off-putting. Overall, owners rate the Echo/Neutra 1956 3H highly for its unique character and comfortable wearability, driven by its exceptional bracelet and distinctive design.
The case finishing and vintage aesthetic are consistently praised. The 100m water resistance and Sellita SW200-1 movement are also noted strengths. Reviewers did not reach a consensus on any weaknesses.
The Glycine Combat Sub Vintage is widely praised by owners for its perfect proportions and slim profile, with one owner noting a thinness of 10.4mm. The unique, non-homage design is a significant draw. However, some owners report sub-par lume and inconsistent power reserve. One owner of a 39mm variant also noted a slightly off-color lume pip on the chapter ring. Overall, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub Vintage highly for its wearability and distinct design at its price point.
The slim 10.5mm thickness is a consensus strength. Reviewers noted the two-tone option as an aesthetic appeal. No consensus weakness was identified.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.