Side by side

Baltic Aquascaphe ClassicvsGlycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

Aquascaphe Classic
BalticAquascaphe Classic
MSRP $648
Combat Sub Box Ceramic
GlycineCombat Sub Box Ceramic
MSRP $1,800

At a glance

16 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
Aquascaphe Classic39mm
Combat Sub Box Ceramic41mm
Power Reserve
Aquascaphe Classic42h
Combat Sub Box Ceramic38h
Water Resistance
Aquascaphe Classic200m
Combat Sub Box Ceramic200m
MSRP
Aquascaphe Classic$648
Combat Sub Box Ceramic$1,800

Full specifications

Case

6 specs
Diameter
39mm
41mm
Thickness
13mm
12.75mm
Lug-to-Lug
47mm
Material
Stainless Steel
Ceramic
Finish
Brushed and polished
Caseback
Solid

Crystal & Dial

5 specs
Crystal Shape
Flat
AR Coating
Yes
Dial Color
Black Gilt
Grey
Indices
Applied
Lume
SuperLuminova
Luminous

Movement

4 specs
Caliber
Miyota 9039
SW200-1
Power Reserve
42h
38h
Jewels
25
26
Complications
None
Date

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$648
$1,800

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Baltic Aquascaphe Classic vs Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Baltic Aquascaphe Classic

Owners widely praise the Baltic Aquascaphe Classic for its vintage-inspired design, comfortable 39mm wearability, and attractive blue sunburst dial with gold indices. Some owners note a hollow feeling and slight bezel play, while others point to rough case edges and sharp lugs. The faux vintage lume is considered weak by some, and the dial can appear dark without direct light due to limited anti-reflective coating. Accuracy is generally found to be good. On balance, owners rate the Baltic Aquascaphe Classic highly for its aesthetic appeal and comfortable wear at its price point.

From video reviewers

The Baltic Aquascaphe Classic is praised for its exceptional value and unique aesthetic. The watch's bezel action is somewhat stiff and could be improved. Reviewers disagree on the watch's water resistance, with one reviewer finding it unimpressive compared to other dive watches in its price range, while others do not mention any specific issues.

Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic

Owners widely praise the Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic for its exceptional thinness at 10.4mm for a 42mm diver, perfect proportions for small wrists, and unique, non-homage aesthetic, with some considering it the best dive watch under $400 due to its superior finishing and value. The case shape, dimensions, and drilled lugs are also highlighted as positives, and the dial is legible with good lume on the hands. However, reviewers and owners consistently flag sub-par lume on the markers that fades quickly, and an inconsistent power reserve. Some owners report the stock strap or bracelet is subpar, and one owner experienced the bezel detaching after a light bump, questioning build quality. Accuracy figures vary, with one owner noting it runs about 2.5 seconds fast per day, while another reports an inconsistent power reserve. On balance, owners rate the Glycine Combat Sub Box Ceramic highly for its thinness, unique design, and value, despite concerns about lume and strap quality.

Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.