Beaufort BicompaxvsHamilton American Classic Intra-Matic Chronograph H

lug2lug doesn't sell watches. Buy links open the brand's or seller's own site. Some links are affiliate links: lug2lug may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosures
Measurements
Catalog photos are all shot at the same flattering size. These aren't: every case below shares one millimeter scale.

Bicompax

American Classic Intra-Matic Chronograph H
Diameter
40.5mm
40mm
Lug-to-Lug
47mm
lowest
49mm
Thickness
13.8mm
lowest
14.3mm
Water Resistance
50m
100m
highest
Power Reserve
63h
highest
60h
MSRP
$810
lowest
$2,495
Movement
Sellita SW510
Hamilton H-51
Case
4 specsCrystal & Dial
2 specsMovement
2 specsPricing
1 specsReviews
Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.
Owners widely praise the Beaufort Bicompax for its attractive bicompax chronograph design, clean aesthetic, and excellent legibility with effective lume. The Sellita SW510 BH b movement is noted for performing well, with winding and setting actions comparable to ETA movements and accuracy within COSC parameters at +5 seconds/day. Fit and finish are considered spot on, with a well-executed gradient dial and subdials, and the h-link bracelet is described as comfortable and easy to size. Some owners find the price a bit high for the specifications on paper, and one commenter felt the blue dial could have more depth. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Beaufort Bicompax highly for its vintage aesthetic and reliable manual-wind chronograph movement at 40.5mm.
Owners and reviewers widely praise the Hamilton American Classic Intra-Matic Chronograph H for its attractive vintage-inspired design, clean dial, and satisfying manual-wind H-51 movement. The 40mm case size is frequently highlighted as a positive, contributing to comfortable wearability. Some owners note the watch consistently receives compliments and appreciate its historical significance and value. The watch's timekeeping is generally good, with one reviewer noting +3 seconds per day and a 60-hour power reserve. However, the 14.35mm thickness is noted by several sources as being on the thicker side for a hand-wound chronograph, though it is still considered to wear well. One owner found the date setting unusual and the rotor audible. There is also a mention of some owners wishing for a three-subdial version and criticism of the OEM strap being utilitarian.
Similar watches
Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price, microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.
Also compared
Comparisons nearby in the catalog: alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.








