Side by side

Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40vsRolex Oyster Perpetual

The numbers, the dial colors, the calibers — laid out so you can stop flipping between tabs.

What people say

Owners + reviewers, side by side

Synthesized for each watch independently from owner discussions, enthusiast forums, written reviews, and video reviewers.

Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40

Owners widely praise the Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 for its captivating aventurine dial and photorealistic, luminescent moon, with many receiving compliments and finding it a stylish, lightweight, and comfortable daily wear. The in-house Calibre JJ04 module's 128-year moon tracking is a notable feature. However, multiple owners find the lack of dial indices and bezel markings, along with unlumed hands, makes precise time-telling difficult, with some describing it as more of a jewelry piece than a functional timepiece. One owner experienced a movement issue requiring warranty repair within the first year, and another noted frustration with customer service. The 40.5mm case size is considered sporty by some, and the design is described as "shouty" by a few. On balance, owners highly rate the Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 for its stunning moonphase display and aesthetic appeal at its price point, despite legibility concerns.

From video reviewers

The aventurine dial and Globolight lume are praised for their realistic starry night effect. The 3 ATM water resistance is a significant limitation.

Rolex Oyster Perpetual

Owners widely praise the Rolex Oyster Perpetual for its clean, simple, and understated design, perfect weight, and great fit as a versatile, discreet, and beautiful first Rolex suitable for everyday wear. Reviewers note the 41mm yellow-dial model is surprisingly wearable and slides under a cuff easily due to its 12mm thickness, while some owners find the 34mm size a discreet daily wearer that tucks neatly under a sleeve. Some owners find the sunburst dials dressier than alternatives, and one owner considers it the best watch regardless of price due to its quality and non-flashy appearance. Lume in the thin hands is nearly invisible in darkness. Availability is challenging, with many configurations difficult to acquire from authorized dealers without a significant wait time or prior history, leading some to seek them on the grey market. On balance, owners and reviewers rate the Rolex Oyster Perpetual highly for its understated appeal and suitability as a versatile daily watch.

From video reviewers

The Rolex Oyster Perpetual's enduring appeal and versatility for everyday wear are consistently praised. Reviewers note the watch's high price point relative to its specifications and mention the difficulty in acquiring one at retail due to demand.

At a glance

22 of 29 specs differ
Diameter
C1 Moonphase 4047.9mm
Oyster Perpetual31mm
Power Reserve
C1 Moonphase 4038h
Oyster Perpetual55h
Water Resistance
C1 Moonphase 4030m
Oyster Perpetual100m
MSRP
C1 Moonphase 40$3,050
Oyster Perpetual$6,200

Full specifications

Case

9 specs
Category
Mechanical
Diameter
47.9mm
31mm
Thickness
13.3mm
Lug-to-Lug
47.9mm
Lug Width
20mm
Material
Stainless Steel
Oystersteel
Finish
Brushed + Polished
Water Resistance
30m
100m
Caseback
Monobloc middle case, screw-down case back and winding crown

Crystal & Dial

5 specs
Crystal Shape
Flat
AR Coating
Underside
Dial Color
Blue
Green
Indices
Index
Lume
SLN X1 WL C1
Chromalight

Movement

7 specs
Caliber
Sellita SW220-1
2232
Beat Rate
4 vph
28,800 vph
Power Reserve
38h
55h
Jewels
26
31
Hacking
No
Yes
Hand-winding
No
Yes
Complications
Moonphase, Day-date
None

Pricing

1 specs
MSRP
$3,050
$6,200
Keep exploring

More watches worth a look

Matched to the watches above on size, movement, style and price — microbrands first. Open any one to dig in.

Follow this matchup

Get a note when Christopher Ward C1 Moonphase 40 vs Rolex Oyster Perpetual gets more votes, a community discussion, or a price drop. No account needed.

Adjacent matchups

People also compared

Comparisons nearby in the catalog — alternatives to the watches above paired against the matchup.